Charges for Medical Records Used in Tennessee Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Cases

Unlike Kentucky, Tennessee does not have a law that permits each patient to have a free copy of his or her medical record from a health care provider.  Tennessee law permits health care providers to charge for each and every copy of a medical record.

It is important to have a copy of certain medical records to evaluate every personal injury and wrongful death claim, including car and truck accident cases and each and other cases.  The number of providers from whom records must be obtained depends on the facts and circumstances of each case.  Some cases require us to obtain medical records from only one or tow health care providers.  Other cases require us to obtain records from ten or more health care providers.  The cost of obtaining records can be as little as $75 to well over $1000.

Our firm pays for the cost of acquiring the medical records for our clients. Even the event the case is successful, our fee agreement with our client provides that our client reimburses us for the out-of-pocket expenses we incur in the case, including the cost of obtaining medical records.

Continue Reading...

What Does It Cost to Issue a Subpoena?

A subpoena is a court order requiring a person to appear in court to give testimony, produce documents or things, or both.

Subpoenas are issued by the clerk of the court in which the case is pending.  In Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, there is a $6.00 fee to issue a subpoena.  if the witness lives in Davidson County and the lawsuit is pending in Davidson County, the Davidson County Sheriff's office will serve the subpoena for $9.00.

Different charges apply if the witness must be served in a different county.  The Clerk of Court will answer questions about the charges in such cases.

 

 

Sexual Abuse of Children in Tennessee Churches

As difficult as it is to believe, children continue to be molested in Tennessee churches.  Those who sexually abuse children put themselves in environments where children are present, and one place where many Tennessee children are routinely present is in church-sponsored child care centers, Sunday school classes and schools, and church camps and other church-related activities.

Responsible churches have a method a screening people who seek to work (as employees or volunteers) with children and have effective mechanisms in place to identify those who engage in suspicious behavior.  Responsible churches also have  mechanisms  in place to promptly investigate allegations of inappropriate activity  and report such persons as required by law. Prompt, accurate  reporting prevents future acts of abuse.

The failure  of churches to take responsible steps to protect children from predators can result in legal liability for the church.  Our Tennessee sex abuse lawyers  first became involved in this type of case over a decade ago, and as recently as this month (May 2013) we have been employed to investigate another church-related claim.

If your child has been sexually abused in a church-related setting, please call us for a free consultation.  If we agree that your child's case has potential merit, we will embark upon an investigation to lead us to determine whether evidence exists that the church or others bear responsibility in the assault; this investigation will be conducted at no charge to you.  It is important to act quickly in these matters, as investigations become more difficult as time passes.   You can reach us at 866-812-8787 (local number - 615-742-4880) or if you complete our Contact Form we will call you.  All inquires will be kept confidential.

Continue Reading...

Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee Personal Injury Jury Trial Results for January, 2013

Here are the results for personal injury and wrongful death jury trials in Nashville, Davidson County, Tennessee for January, 201.

Automobile Case:  $339,163 for the Plaintiff

Automobile Case:  $143,451 plus $7500 for the Plaintiff

Automobile Case:  $10,001 (minus 20% for comparative fault) for the Plaintiff

Negligence / Breach of Warranty:  Defense verdict.

 

 

 

Will the At-Fault Driver's Insurance Company Have to Pay My Future Medical Bills?

Under Tennessee injury law, a person who causes harm to another is responsible for the reasonable medical costs incurred by the injured party to diagnosis and treat injuries that were caused in the incident and to pay the present day value of future medical expenses likely to be incurred in the future as a result of injuries caused in the incident.

However, the at-fault driver's insurance company is only responsible for future medical expenses that are more likely than not to occur in the future, not those that might occur.  Thus, your ability to recover future medical expenses for injuries that arise out of car or truck accident is dependent on medical testimony that, more likely than not, an injury that happened in the accident will require medical treatment in the future.

The following example will help in understanding the law.  Assume you are hurt in a Tennessee truck  accident and suffer a fractured hip.  You undergo hip surgery and physical therapy.  Your total medical bills are $60,000.  The insurance company wants to settle your case, but you and your lawyer are concerned about the risk of future surgery because your doctor has told you that you might have to have hip replacement surgery in the future.  Hip replacement surgery is expensive, and you want to have the at-fault driver's insurance company pay for the surgery if it occurs.  How can you make that happen?

You cannot.  The at-fault driver's insurance company will never agree to cover medical bills that are incurred after your settlement or trial.  And your lawyer can not ask the judge or jury for a court order that requires the the at-fault driver or that driver's insurance company to pay your future medical bills as they occur in the future.  

If you want to recover the value of the future surgery, you will have to present medical proof that, (a) your hip was fractured in the accident; (b) your hip had to be surgically repaired; (c) as a result it is likely that you will need hip replacement surgery in the future.  Here is a short-hand version of the testimony you would like to have:

In my opinion as an orthopedic surgeon, it is very likely Ms. Jones will require hip replacement surgery in 12 - 15 years.  The cost of that surgery today would be $75,000.  After that surgery, it is my opinion that Ms. Jones will require 18 - 24 physical therapy sessions to recover full mobility.  Today, those sessions cost $110 each.    In my experience, a hip replacement typically provides relief to the patient for only 15 years.  Thus, give the fact that Mrs. Jones was only 48 years old when her hip was fractured in the truck accident, she will need at least one more hip replacement in the lifetime.  After this surgery, the same number of physical therapy sessions will be necessary.  I hold these opinions to a reasonable degree of medical certainty.

With this type of evidence, a lawyer will then use an appropriate expert to estimate the costs of two hip replacement surgeries  and the future physical therapy (adjusting for inflation ) and the same (or another) expert to reduce the cost of the future treatment to current day dollars (the "present value" of the future expenses).  This number is then taken into account in determining the total settlement or, if there is no settlement, the total damages awarded by the jury.

As indicated earlier, however, medical evidence is required to prove these expenses and the need for the surgery, and the medical evidence must meet the "more likely than not" threshold.  If a doctor says that future medical expenses are only "possible," that they "could" happen, or that they "might" occur, Tennessee law will not permit those expenses to be recovered in a personal injury case.  Insurance companies are well-aware of this law, so it is important to have documentation of the this medical evidence at the time of settlement negotiations.  If there is a trial, testimony of the appropriate experts will be required to establish the need and cost of future medical expenses.

The entire issue of future medical expenses is another reason why it is important to employ an experienced person injury lawyer to assist you in Tennessee automobile and truck wreck cases and in all other types of personal injury cases.  A good lawyer not only understands the law but can work with medical expenses to present your case in the best possible light.  Of course, a lawyer cannot or will not force a doctor to give anything other than the doctor's honest opinion, but a very good lawyer will work with your doctor to make sure he or she understands that the law does not require absolute certainty on this issue but instead only requires that an opinion on future medical expenses be held at the "more likely than not" level of certainty.

 

 

Civil Liability for Stalking in Tennessee -- Lawsuits and Damages

Stalking is willful conduct involving repeated harassment of someone that causes them to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed or molested. Not only is the conduct a crime in Tennessee, but it also can rise to a civil lawsuit and a damage award if it results in the victim suffering serious or severe emotional distress.

A theory of liability that stalking victims can use to pursue a civil claim for money damages against the stalker is either intentional infliction of emotional distress or negligent infliction of emotional distress.  In a claim for intentional claim for emotional distress the victim must prove that the stalker intentionally or recklessly engaged in outrageous conduct that caused the victim serious or severe emotional injury.  In negligent infliction of emotional distress claims the victims must prove that the stalker negligently engaged in conduct that caused serious or severe emotional injury.

In the conduct was intentional or reckless, no medical evidence is necessary to prove serious or severe emotional injury, although the presence of medical evidence will strengthen the case.  If the conduct by the stalker was merely negligent medical evidence of serious or severe emotional injury is required.

There is also a potential claim for invasion of privacy.  To prove invasion of privacy and collect monetary damages, one must prove that the stalker  intentionally intruded, physically or otherwise, upon the solitude or seclusion of the victim or the victim's private affairs or concerns, and that the intrusion would be highly offensive to a reasonable person.

A person who believes that he or she is being stalked should notify the police. He or she should also keep a notebook of events that are part of the stalking, should retain all documents linked to the stalking activity, and should make and keep pertinent photographs.  

In general, Tennessee law requires that a lawsuit seeking damages for stalking be filed one year after a person is injured by this type of activity.  As you can understand, it is often difficult to define exactly when "injury" occurs, so it is prudent to seek out the advice of an experienced Tennessee injury lawyer as soon as possible to learn (a) whether the activity gives rise to civil liability and (b) what deadline applies for legal action under the facts.

Continue Reading...

What Does It Mean When a Jury is "Deadlocked?"

A jury is considered "deadlocked" when it is unable to reach an unanimous decision.  In Tennessee personal injury and wrongful death trials a jury of twelve people sits in judgment of the case and all twelve must agree on all issues.  When they fail to do so they are "deadlocked."

A judge faced with a deadlocked jury has two choices.  First, the judge can send the jury home, declare a mistrial, and order the parties to another trial.  This is an expensive option, both for the parties to the lawsuit and the justice system, because of the money that will be spent on the new trial.

The other option is for the judge to give what is known as a "dynamite" or "Allen" charge.  A dynamite or Allen charge is a jury instruction that strongly encourages each juror to reconsider his or her views and work toward compromise.  It tells jurors that a new trial will be very costly to the parties and that the jurors should work harder to solve their differences.

Under Tennessee law such a jury instruction can be given in a civil case only if the parties to the case agree to the charge.  Otherwise, the mere giving of the charge can result in the case being reversed on appeal.

Many states do not require unanimous jury verdicts in personal injury, wrongful death or other types of civil cases and thus rarely have deadlocked juries.  These states usually allow one, two or even three of the twelve jurors to disagree with the remaining jurors and the jury verdict of the super-majority is still valid.  

 

I Need a Tennessee Car Accident Lawyer. Do I Need to Pay You A Fee to Meet With Me?

 No.  At the Law Offices of John Day, P.C. we do not charge a fee to meet with any potential client who wants to discuss a potential car accident, truck accident or other personal injury claim with us.  We will meet with you or a member of your family in our office, your home or even the hospital, depending on the circumstances.  

Why do we not charge for an initial meeting?  There are two reasons.  First, we understand that most people who meet with us about a potential injury claim are already facing a bunch of bills arising from the event that requires them to see a lawyer.  Our potential clients are facing medical bills, time lost from work, and other financial stresses, and the last thing they need to spend money on is an hour meeting with a lawyer.

Second, when you meet with us to see if we are the right lawyer for you we are meeting with you and making sure that you are a client that we believe we can help.  From time to time, people come to us with cases that we believe simply lack merit and we simply cannot help those people other than to tell them the problems we see with their case.  Other people come to us with legal problems that do not justify the cost of litigation.  So, we feel it is only fair that we do not impose any sort of a charge for an initial meeting with a personal injury client because both of us are trying to figure out whether there is a good "fit" between us.

Call us at 866-812-8787 to set up a meeting to discuss your potential case.  

How Many People Sit on A Jury In A Tennessee Personal Injury Case?

Tennessee law requires juries of twelve citizens in injury trials and in all other types of civil and criminal jury trials.  Rarely, the lawyers in the case will agree that the case can be decided by less than twelve people, but a very, very high percentage of jury trials in Tennessee are decided by twelve jurors.  A judge cannot require that a case is decided by less than twelve jurors.

Depending on the anticipated length and complexity of the trial, a judge may also have one or more alternate jurors hear the case.  An alternate juror will replace one of the twelve jurors who have been designated to hear the case if one of those jurors becomes ill or for some other reason cannot continue serving as a juror in the case. If none of the group of twelve jurors is required to leave jury service for any reason the alternate jurors are dismissed from the case immediately before the jury begins to deliberate a verdict in the case.  No more than twelve jurors are permitted to decide the case.

In Tennessee a jury's verdict must be unanimous.  In other words, all twelve jurors must agree on the result.  If the jurors are unable to reach an unanimous agreement, a mistrial is declared and the case must be tried to another jury at a later date.

Different rules apply in federal courts in Tennessee and other states.

If you are called for jury duty be sure to participate in the process.  To be sure, jury service can be an inconvenience, but most people who participate in the jury trial process are very glad they did. 

Does The At-Fault Driver's Insurance Company Have to Pay for A Rental Car While My Car Is Being Fixed?

Technically speaking, the automobile insurance company for the driver who caused your accident and damaged your car or truck does not have the responsibility to pay for a rental vehicle while your vehicle is being repaired.  However, as a practical matter, many insurance companies will pay for the cost of a rental car for a reasonable period of time while a vehicle is being repaired.

Why do these insurance companies pay for a rental car when the law doesn't require them to do so?  Because the law requires the insurance company to pay damages for "loss of use" while the vehicle is out of service.  The time that the vehicle is being evaluated for repairs and being repaired must be a reasonable period of time.  

It is difficult to determine the value of "loss of use" but one good way to avoid future litigation over the meaning the phrase and the damages that must be paid is to supply a replacement vehicle for the use of the person whose vehicle was damaged in the wreck.  Thus, insurance companies who believe that their insured driver was at fault will frequently give the claimant the right to rent a replacement vehicle.

As indicated, this right is limited by the rule of reasonableness.  The length that the rental car will be made available is dependent on the circumstances and is dependent on the circumstances.

Does the fact that the insurance company for the at-fault driver has given you the right to get a rental car mean that they are going to treat you fairly in your personal injury claim?  No.  The fact that the insurance company got you a rental car cannot be used against the insurance company in court and does not mean that they will properly and fairly evaluate your claim for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.  Unless your injury is very minor, you will still benefit from the assistance of lawyer in evaluating your case and negotiating with the at-fault driver's insurance company.  

Continue Reading...
Ask A Question Case Evaluation
Twitter Facebook
About John A. Day

I am a fifty-three year old lawyer who is fascinated by the law of torts. I have studied the field for over twenty-nine years. I represent plaintiffs in personal injury and wrongful death cases.

Read More »