Is Testimony From A Doctor Necessary to Prove a Medical Malpractice Case?

I think I was injured by medical malpractice.  I talked to a lawyer at church and she said that another doctor would have to testify against my doctor.  Is that right?

Generally, yes. In fact, most cases require testimony from more than one expert medical witness. The expert(s) must testify (1) what level or type of care was necessary in the community given the medical issue; (b) that the appropriate level of care was not provided; and (c) that the inappropriate care caused the injury or death of the patient that would not have otherwise occurred.

This is a very complicated area of the lawyer, and I strongly suggest that you consult an experienced medical malpractice lawyer to evaluate your case.

I Was Raped. Do I Have A Right to Sue the Rapist?

I was raped.  The police found the rapist and he is in jail.  Can I sue him?

Yes.  Rape is a crime that will result in prison time but it is also what is known as a "tort."  There are many different types of torts, but rape would be the civil tort of battery.  Battery is the unlawful touching of another person. 

The problem with suing rapists is that they may not have money and therefore it will be very difficult to collect the damages you win.  Hopefully, the person who did this to you will be going to prison and therefore will not be earning any real income, but that of course has the practical effect of making it difficult to collect damages from him.

That being said, it makes sense to talk to an experienced personal injury lawyer and let him or her help you determine if you have a case that can be pursued.  Depending on the circumstances, there may be other persons who also share responsibility for the rapist's acts.  In Tennessee you should assume that legal action must be filed against the rapist within one year of the date of the rape unless an experienced lawyer who is aware of all of the facts tells you that you have more time.

What is My DePuy ASR Hip Implant Case Worth?

I am one of the people who has a recalled DePuy ASR hip implant.   Indeed, both of my hips have this system and both now need to be replaced.   What are my rights?  What is my case worth?

A total hip replacement replaces the body’s natural joint with an artificial one, usually made out of metal and plastic. A typical total hip replacement system consists of four separate components: (1) a femoral stem (2) a femoral head, (3) a liner, and (4) an acetabular shell. The surgeon hollows out a patient’s femur bone and the femoral stem is implanted. The femoral head is a metal ball that is fixed on top of the femoral stem. The femoral head forms the hip joint when it is placed inside the polyethylene liner and acetabular shell.

The DePuy ASR is a type of  artificial hip replacement system.  The first components of the system was approved for use by the FDA in late 2003.  Other components or related systems were approved for use in later years. 

On March 8, 2010, Pamela L. Plouhar, Vice President of Worldwide Clinical Affairs for DePuy, issued an “URGENT FIELD SAFETY NOTICE” to surgeons concerning a high amount of revisions of people who received the ASR prosthesis.  On or about July 17, 2010, a Class 2 recall of many of the ASR components was posted on the FDA’s website  and both the DePuy ASR XL Acetabular and DePuy ASR Hip Resurfacing Systems were recalled.    It appears that there are some 27,000 people in the United States who have replacement hips that are the subject of the recall.  The company has said that only the DePuy ASR XL Acetabular system was used in the United States.

The symptoms of the problem include pain, swelling and problems walking.  Continuing symptoms may indicate that the implant is not staying attached to the bone in the correct position, has been fractured, or has been dislocated.   Another problem is the release of metal particles into the joint and in the muscles around the joint.  In some patients this can result in pain and swelling and could cause damage to the muscles, bones and nerves around the hip.  Tests are necessary to determine if the hip is working properly and if there is a reaction to the metal particles.

The value of your case is dependent on many factors.  The claim against DePuy is a type of personal injury claim known as a products liability claim and Tennessee law permits the recovery of damages as described in more detail here.   As you can see from reviewing the information described in the link, determining the value of a case is a very complicated issue and experienced lawyers must gather lots of information before reaching the value of a case.

Our firm has filed two DePuy ASR hip replacement cases and is evaluating several others at this time.  For more information contact me 866-812-8787 (a toll-free number) or 615-742-4880.  You may also reach me by email at jday@johndaylegal.com.

Deadline for Filing Personal Injury Claim for Wreck with Truck in Tennessee

How much time do I have to file a personal injury claim for a wreck with a tractor-trailer ?

 In the wreck took place in Tennessee you should assume you only have one year to bring a legal action against the people and companies that caused the wreck unless a competent Tennessee lawyer with knowledge of all of the circumstances tells you to the contrary.

However, it would be a mistake to wait any significant time to call a lawyer. The insurance and trucking companies often have expert witnesses and lawyers go to the scenes of serious trucking accidents. They are gathering evidence and preparing for a defense, and you need to have a lawyer start doing the same for you. Waiting even thirty days to get legal assistance may mean that valuable evidence is gone and therefore I urge you to contact a lawyer as soon as possible.

What Does It Mean When a Personal Injury Lawyer is Included on the "Best Lawyers" List?

I am looking for a personal injury lawyer and see that a few lawyers are included on the "Best Lawyers" list.  What does that mean?

 

“Best Lawyers” is a national organization that recognizes outstanding lawyers in each state in a large number of legal specialties. Best Lawyers compiles lists of outstanding attorneys by conducting exhaustive peer-review surveys in which thousands of leading lawyers confidentially evaluate their professional peers. In the U.S., Best Lawyers publishes an annual referral guide, The Best Lawyers in America, which includes 39,766 attorneys in 80 practice areas, covering all 50 states and the District of Columbia. This publication is one way you can determine if the lawyer who you are thinking about hiring is respected by his or her peers.  You can read more about the selection process here.

I am honored to have  been listed in Best Lawyers in America every year since 1993, when I was 36 years old.

The Best Lawyers organization has recently started to select "Lawyers of the Year."  Here is a description of the criteria:

The lawyers being honored as “Lawyers of the Year” were selected because they received particularly high ratings from most of their peers. In some cases, they also received particularly effusive comments from some of those same peers. The selected lawyers have earned a high level of respect among other leading lawyers in the same communities and the same practice areas for their abilities, their professionalism, and their integrity. 

I was recognized as the Best Lawyers as “Personal Injury Lawyer of the Year” in Nashville in 2009 and the “Medical Malpractice Lawyer of the Year” in Nashville in 2010.

There are some fine lawyers who are not included on these lists. Nevertheless, it is fair to say that the "Best Lawyers" list is yet another way for a consumer to gauge the reputation of a lawyer in the legal community.

Do you want more information on what factors you should consider as you decide who  to hire as your personal injury or wrongful death lawyer? Read here.

 

I Was Uninsured and Caused a Car Wreck. Now I Am Getting Sued by Other Driver's Insurance Company. Help!

I ran a red light four months ago and hit another car.  The other driver was not hurt.   It cost the other driver $3200 to get his car fixed.  He asked me to have my insurance company pay it and I told him I didn't have any insurance on my car at the time.  Now his insurance company is suing me.  What's up with that?

You caused a wreck and you are responsible for the harm and damages you cause.  You were lucky you only caused property damage and not a personal injury, but you are responsible for reasonable cost of fixing the car and for loss of use of the car while it was being fixed.

The other driver's insurance company paid because you did not have insurance.  This insurance company now has a right to seek reimbursement from you.  This is called "subrogation."

Most insurance companies will work out a payment plan with you.  If you do not feel comfortable negotiating with the insurance company you will need to hire a lawyer to help you.  Do not ignore this - is is very unlikely to just go away.

By the way, you need to get some car insurance.  Tennessee law requires it, and if you had insurance in place at the time  your insurance company would have made this payment for you.

Some Lawyer Called Me About My Car Wreck

I was in a car wreck last week.  I was hurt pretty bad.  I got home from the hospital last night and a lawyer called me and said that he wanted to represent me in my case.  I have no idea who this guy is or how he got my name and telephone number.  Nobody in my family has ever heard of him.  Can he call me like this?  Should I hire him?  He said he could get me a lot of money.

This lawyer is a scumbag - not only should you not hire him but you should report him to the Tennessee Board of Professional Responsibility.  Rule 7.3(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct says this about soliciting a potential client by telephone:  "(a) If a significant motive for the solicitation is the lawyer’s pecuniary gain, a lawyer shall not solicit professional employment by in-person, live telephone, or real-time electronic contact from a prospective client who has not initiated the contact with the lawyer and with whom the lawyer has no family or prior professional relationship."  The Comment to the rule explains why is exists:

[1] There is a potential for abuse inherent in direct in-person or live telephone contact by a lawyer with a prospective client known to need legal services. These forms of contact between a lawyer and a specifically targeted recipient subject the layperson to the private importuning of the trained advocate in a direct interpersonal encounter. The prospective client, who may already feel overwhelmed by the circumstances giving rise to the need for legal services, may find it difficult fully to evaluate all available alternatives with reasoned judgment and appropriate self-interest in the face of the lawyer’s presence and insistence upon being retained immediately. The situation is fraught with the possibility of undue influence, intimidation, and overreaching.

A lawyer who engages in this conduct is subject to various types of discipline and, in fact, risks loss of his or her license to practice law.

So, why should you care?  I mean, you just need a lawyer, and if the lawyer has undertaken the initiative to seek you out, didn't that just make your job easier?

Here is why you should care.  Every law student is taught that this lawyer cannot do what he did. The prohibition is reinforced in legal seminars for practicing lawyers.  So, you have to ask yourself these questions:  If a lawyer is willing to violate the rules of the profession to get my case, why should I believe that he will follow other rules that are designed to protect my interests?  Why should I believe that he will honestly communicate with me?   Why should I assume that a cheater will only cheat once?   Why should I take the risk that he might cheat me?  Why should I take the risk that he might try to cheat my opponent, get caught and hurt my case?

So, don't hire a lawyer who calls you out of nowhere trying to solicit your case.  Instead, read our legal guide "Understanding How to Hire a Lawyer in Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Cases" to learn about the factors you should consider in determining what lawyer to hire for your case.

 

I Don't Want to Answer Interrogatories!

I am in the middle of a lawsuit and my lawyer just sent me a mess of interrogatories that she says I have to answer.  I don't want to answer these questions - the information is none of their business.  What happens if I don't answer them?

Interrogatories are written questions sent from one party in a lawsuit to an opposing party about issues related to the lawsuit.  For example, in a lawsuit arising from a motor vehicle collision, each driver may send interrogatories to the other ask for driving histories, including whether the opposing driver has ever received a driving citation. The party responding to interrogatories must sign a statement swearing or affirming that the responses to the interrogatories are true.

If you don't answer the interrogatories, your opponent can go to court and get an order requiring you to answer them.  You might be forced to pay the legal fees incurred by  your opponent to obtain this court order.  If you don't comply with the court order you can face more fees and, in fact, you risk having your case dismissed.

You need to discuss your concerns with your lawyer immediately.  She will tell you which questions you must answer and which, if any, you may refuse to answer.  

Can I Make the Other Driver Responsible for My Medical Bills for Life?

I was hurt in a car wreck.  My back and leg were injuried.  I don't need surgery right now but who knows what will happen 10 years from now.  Can I settle my case for my medical bills, my lost wages, and my pain and suffering and an agreement that the at-fault driver will pay my future medical bills if I have any?

You can try, but in 29 years as a lawyer I have never seen the argument work.  If the at-fault driver's insurance company believes that its driver is at fault and they want to settle the case, they want to settle all personal injury-related claims at one time.   (They will usually settle property damage claims seperately.)   They will not agree to leave open the issue of future medical expenses.

Thus, if a doctor says you will probably need a future surgery because of the injuries you sustained in the wreck, the cost of that surgery and related damages can be part of settlement negotiations.  If the doctor says that future surgery is possible, then the amount of the possible surgery cannot be included.  If there is a trial, the court will allow testimony only on whether a future surgery is probable and, if a doctor says it is, then the court will allow presentation of evidence on the cost of the surgery and related damages.

I hasten to add that worker's compensation cases are different and, in those cases, it is very common that the employer bears the responsibility of paying future medical bills related to the injury even after a settlement or trial.  Be sure to ask your worker's compensation lawyer what responsibility the employer will have for your future medical bills before you accept any settlement proposal.

Why Do I Have To Sign My Name When I Answer Interrogatories?

I am involved in a lawsuit and had to answer interrogatories.  Why did I have to go to the trouble of signing my name to my answers in the presence of a notary public?

As you know, Interrogatories are written questions sent from one party in a lawsuit to an opposing party about issues related to the lawsuit.  For example, in a lawsuit arising from a motor vehicle collision, each driver may send interrogatories to the other ask for driving histories, including whether the opposing driver has ever received a driving citation. The party responding to interrogatories must sign a statement swearing or affirming that the responses to the interrogatories are true.

The reason the signature under oath is required is because answers to interrogatories are deemed to be the equivalent of testimony under oath at trial.   As they say, what you say (or don't say) in response to the questions asked can be used against you in a court of law.  The signature under oath reinforces the truth-telling requirement, and the signature in the presence of a notary public makes it virtually impossible for someone to say that the signature on the answers is not genuine.

It is very important that interrogatories be answered truthfully.  I have seen cases severely damaged when false information was given in answers to interrogatories.  Conversely, I have seen cases for my clients vastly improve when a defendant gave false answers to interrogatories that we filed.

My Neighbor's Dog Bit Me!

I was visiting my neighbor.  He has a dog that is usually chained up but ran up behind me after I stepped off my neighbor's porch and bit me on the back of the leg.  I fell down and he bit me again on the arm before my neighbor was able to get him off me.   The dog was chained up because he bit someone about 3 years ago, but now they leave him off the chain from time to time to let him get exercise in the yard.   I ended up getting an infection from the bites, have missed four weeks of work and spent thousands of dollars in medical bills.  What are my rights?

Under Tennessee law a dog owner has a duty to exercise reasonable control over his dog.  If you are bitten by a dog on the dog owner's property while you are on the property with the owner's permission you have to prove that the dog owner knew or should have known about the dog owner's dangerous propensities and that that he or she did not exercise reasonable control over the dog.

If you win your case, you are entitled to payment of damages.  Most injuries caused by dog bites are covered under the dog owner's homeowner's insurance policy.  

The damages that you may recover are discussed in our legal guide, Understanding Damages in Personal Injury Cases.

I suggest you meet with an experienced personal injury lawyer to gain a better understanding of how Tennessee law applies to the facts of your case.  Please remember that under Tennessee law personal injury claims must be filed against the responsible parties within one year of the date of the injury.  Failure to file suit within one year will result in a loss of your rights.

I Might Need Surgery!

I was hurt in a boating accident.   It was the other guy's fault.  The doctor said that as I result of my injuries I might need knee surgery one day.  Can I recover damages for the cost of that surgery?

You can recover damages for a future surgery only if a doctor says it is reasonably likely to occur.  If the surgery is merely possible or might happen, the law of Tennessee does not permit you to ask a judge or jury to award damages for the cost of that surgery.

What Is The Likelihood My Case Will Go to Trial?

I have a personal injury case pending in state court in Tennessee.  What are the odds that my case will go to trial?

These statistics will give you an idea of how many cases are actually tried. In the one-year period ending June 30, 2009, there were about 11,000 lawsuits filed involving all types of personal injury and wrongful death in the state of Tennessee. (Many other cases were settled before a lawsuit was even filed; those numbers are not publicly available.) However, there were only 260 jury trials and 348 non-jury trials in personal injury and wrongful death cases during that same period. These statistics are about the same from year to year, and thus it is fair to say that only about 5% percent of personal injury and wrongful death cases in which lawsuits are filed actually go to trial.

It is difficult to predict, however, whether any particular case will settle.  Our experience is that a case is more likely to settle at a higher dollar value if the insurance company (a) sees that the case has been prepare for trial and (b) has been appropriately prepared by lawyers who it knows are not afraid to go to trial. Thus, our office prepares all cases as if the case is going to be tried. Quite frankly, this means we invest more time and money into cases than many other lawyers, but we believe that this approach leads to better results for our clients.

Do I Need to Attend the Pretrial Conference?

I have a case coming to trial in two weeks.  There is a pretrial conference scheduled.  What is that?  Do I need to attend?

Generally, conferences are held prior to a trial so that the Judge and lawyers can resolve disputes about the admissibility of evidence, the timing of witness testimony, and other logistical matters. Pre-trial conferences can greatly streamline the progression of a trial thereby minimizing the financial cost on the parties, witnesses, jurors and the Court.

You need to ask your lawyer whether you should attend the pretrial conference.  

I Received a Subpoena. Now What?

I saw a truck - car wreck a year ago.  Now I have been subpoenaed to give a deposition.  Do I have to give a deposition?  I don't really want to be involved.

 Subpoenas are legal papers issued by a court requiring the appearance or production of a person or thing at a deposition or hearing. A subpoena may be served on a person and require the appearance of that person to give a deposition or appear in open court on a specific date and time. Subpoenas may also be served on a person or business and require that documents or things be produced for inspection and copying on a specific date and time.

You have a duty to obey the subpoena.  If the date or time is particularly inconvenient call the lawyer that had the subpoena served on you and explain your problem.  Most lawyers are very willing to cooperate with scheduling problems of witnesses.

 

 

Why Do I Have to Submit to a Medical Evaluation?

I am in a car  wreck lawsuit.  I received injuries to my back.   Now, the defendant wants to have me evaluated by a doctor that the defendant's insurance company is going to hire.  Can they do that?

Probably.  If your medical well being is in question in a case the opposing party may request that you undergo a medical evaluation by a doctor of their choosing.   That doctor will offer his or her opinion about the nature and extent of your injuries and the impact of those injuries on your later life. That doctor may disagree with your doctor’s opinion as to the nature and extent of your injuries, and the jury will hear from both doctors at trial.  

This type of examination is known as a defense medical examination or a Rule 35 medical examination.  (Rule 35 is the rule of court procedures that governs medical examinations.)

Your lawyer will be able to give you more details about the examination and whether or not you can avoid it under the facts of your case.

How Quickly Will My Case Settle?

I was in a car wreck about 6 months ago.  The other driver admitted fault.  My medical bills are about $25,000.   I have been released by my doctor.  My lost wages are $2000.   How quickly will my case settle?

At the outset you need to understand that your case may not settle at all.  In Tennessee the insurance company does not have a duty to settle your case and in fact does not even owe you a duty to fairly evaluate your case.    It can settle a case, or not settle a case, on whatever schedule it wants to put in place.

However,  if the insurance company wants to settle the case it needs to have information from your lawyer.  At an absolute minimum, the company needs the accident report, your medical records and bills, perhaps some of your previous medical records, proof of lost wages from your employer, and an understanding of how the injuries have impacted your life.  To the extent you claim a permanent injury, future medical expenses, future loss of earning capacity, or other damages, the insurance company will need proof of that.

Lawyers communicate this information by way of a settlement demand.   All of the relevant information is gathered and the important information is highlighted in a letter.  In our office we attempt to gather all of this information before your are released from your doctor (except the final office note) and have a demand package ready to go to the insurance company within thirty days of when medical treatment is complete.  Lack of cooperation from one of the providers of information will affect our ability to get the demand package out on time.

Insurance companies always ask for more time to evaluate the demand package.  Then, the negotiations start and those can last several weeks even if everyone agrees that the case should be settled.

So, the short answer to your question is there are too many variables to say if your case will be settled and how quickly it will be settled.   It is fair to say that a case cannot settle if your attorney does not promptly gather and exchange information with the insurance company.  This is yet another reason to hire an experienced personal injury lawyer who will aggressively pursue your rights.

When Does A Personal Injury Case Become A Wrongful Death Case?

My dad was dropped in a nursing home.  He broke his hip.  He never recovered from it and died two months later.   Do we have a wrongful death case or a personal injury case?

First, no one can tell you if you have a case at all without doing an investigation into the circumstances of the fall.

Second, if you do have a case, it will only be a personal injury case unless a doctor will testify that more likely than not the death was a result of the fall.   To make this determination, a doctor will need to review your father's medical records.  An autopsy may also be necessary.

Dog Bite Case

My child and I were in a public park.  A man was there with his dog.  He did not have it on a leash.  The dog ran over, knocked my child down, and bit her on the face.  She has lots of stitches and may have a scar.  The dog's owner said that the dog has never done this before.  What are my child's rights?

In Tennessee a dog owner has the duty to keep a dog under reasonable control at all times and to prevent the dog from running at large.  If the dog owner does not do so and the animal injures a person on public property (or on private property of someone other than the dog owner) the dog owner is responsible for the dog's actions.

Under these circumstances, this is true even though the dog has never bitten anyone else.

There are several exceptions to this general rule.  For example, if your daughter was harassing or provoking the dog the dog owner would not be liable for the dog's action.

If the dog owner is responsible, the law permits you and  your daughter to recover damages from the owner.  Read more about the damages that can be recovered in our legal guide "Understanding Claims Related to Children."

An experienced personal injury lawyer can fully explain what rights you and your daughter have. 

How Does A Jury Know What My Future Medical Bills Will Be?

I broke my hip in a fall-down accident at a local store.  The company wouldn't settle me so I filed a lawsuit.   The doctor said I might need a hip replacement in the future.  How will a jury award me damages for this surgery? 

Well, first you have to win your case.  That is, you will have to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the store caused the dangerous condition or knew or should have known of the existence of the dangerous condition and failed to rectify it.    

If you prove the fault of the store, then you can recover your past and future medical expenses (and other types of damages).  However, you can recover future medical expenses only if a doctor says that it is more likely than not that you will need hip replacement surgery.  If the doctor says that, the jury can consider the cost of the future surgery, which will come from the testimony of the doctor or another witness.

If a doctor will not say that a future surgery is probable but will only say it is possible, Tennessee law does not permit you to recover damages for the surgery.

Your lawyer will meet with your doctor and determine whether the doctor will testify that  surgery is probable or just possible.   The anticipated testimony of the doctor will influence the value of the case for settlement purposes and at trial.

I Haven't Heard From My Lawyer in Two Months!

I was hurt in a car accident early last year and hired a lawyer to help me with my case against the other driver.  The case has been pending for over a year.  There doesn't seem to be anything going on.  My lawyer said that there would be depositions but they haven't occurred yet.  We do not have a trial date.  I have been calling the lawyer to find out what is going on but despite 5 calls in the last two months I have not gotten a response.   What is going on?   What should I do?

There may be a legitimate reason why depositions have not been taken if your lawsuit has been pending a year, but absent very unusual circumstances depositions of the plaintiff and defendant in a two-vehicle car wreck case should be taken within six months after the case has been filed unless they have been deliberately put on hold pending settlement discussions.  However, if this is your lawyer's plan, he or she should communicate that plan to you so that you know what is going on.

Likewise, there is no excuse for a lawyer (or someone on the lawyer's behalf) not to return a phone call within one business day.   If a lawyer is out of town or in a trial he or she may not be able to get back with you promptly, but should have an assistant call you and advise you of that fact.

I suggest that you make an appointment to meet with your lawyer and express your concerns in person.   If the lawyer doesn't meet with you or does not respond appropriately to your concerns, you need to find a new lawyer.

Should I Hire the Lawyer Who Blogged About My Accident?

I was in a tractor-trailer wreck a couple weeks ago and spent five days in the hospital.  When I got out of the hospital I went on the Internet to see if there was any news articles about my case.  I found that two lawyers had written about my wreck on their law firm blog.  Why did they do that?

They wrote the blog post about your wreck  in the hope that you would find it and hire them.  That is the sole reason that the posts were written - marketing, plain and simple.

There is nothing unethical about this type of blogging.  I have never engaged in the practice, even though I have been blogging for over five years and written over 2000 blog posts, because my idea of a blog is that it is a place to share information and help educate people.  

Don't get me wrong.  I hope that people will read what they find here and reach that conclusion that I am lawyer who they should interview if they have a personal injury or wrongful death case of any type in Tennessee or live in Tennessee and were injured or lost a loved one as a result of another's negligence anywhere else in the world.  But I have simply never seen what public good is served by writing blog posts that share no relevant information whatsoever and are written solely to troll for cases.  Different strokes for different folks, I guess.

I recently read a newspaper article about a tragedy suffered by a local family.  It was the type of case I happen to know something about because of my experience in other cases.  I confess it crossed my mind to write a blog post about it in the hopes that the family would see it and call me.  I quickly decided not to do so - it just seemed tacky to me.  Oddly enough, two weeks later the family called and asked me for help.  

I am not saying that the lawyers who sought your case by blogging about it are bad lawyers. I do suggest, however, that before you hire any lawyer in a personal injury or wrongful death case you read our Legal Guide titled "Understanding How to Hire a Lawyer in Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Cases."   This guide will give you a long list of factors to consider in hiring a lawyer.   Not one of these factors includes whether the lawyer sought to get your case by writing a blog post about it.

 

There Was No Guardrail and I Went Off the Mountain!

I was driving in East Tennessee.  A big truck came over the center-line into my lane and I swerved to avoid it.  I lost control and went off the mountain.  My friend who was in the car behind me saw the whole thing.  He told me that I went through a hole in the guardrail and that the hole had been caused by another wreck nine months earlier that the State of Tennessee had never repaired.   What are my rights?

First, if you can identify the trucking company and truck driver you would have a claim against them for crossing the center-line and forcing you off the road.

Second, even if you can't identify the trucking company, you may have a uninsured motorist claim that you can assert against your own insurance company.  Tennessee law permits you to make a claim on your own insurance when an unknown driver (called a "John Doe" driver) negligently causes a wreck.  The fact that your friend saw the wreck is critical to being able to prove this claim.

Finally, you may have a claim against the State of Tennessee for negligent failure to maintain the guardrail.  The validity of this claim will depend on whether the State had notice that the guardrail was missing.

An experienced personal injury lawyer can help you determine what rights you have.  Remember than under Tennessee law most personal injury claims must be filed in court within one year of the date of the wreck causing your injuries.

 

My Hip Replacement Manufacturer DePuy Orthopaedics Says They Are Recalling My Hip!

I had a hip replacement a couple years ago.  I have had some problems with it.  Now I have received a letter from DePuy Orthopaedics, which has something to do with Johnson & Johnson, saying that my hip is being recalled.   What should I do now?

 

A total hip replacement replaces the body’s natural joint with an artificial one, usually made out of metal and plastic. A typical total hip replacement system consists of four separate components: (1) a femoral stem (2) a femoral head, (3) a liner, and (4) an acetabular shell. The surgeon hollows out a patient’s femur bone and the femoral stem is implanted. The femoral head is a metal ball that is fixed on top of the femoral stem. The femoral head forms the hip joint when it is placed inside the polyethylene liner and acetabular shell.

The DePuy ASR artificial hip replacement system.  The first components of the system was approved for use by the FDA in late 2003.  Other components or related systems were approved for use in later years. 

On March 8, 2010, Pamela L. Plouhar, Vice President of Worldwide Clinical Affairs for DePuy, issued an “URGENT FIELD SAFETY NOTICE” to surgeons concerning a high amount of revisions of people who received the ASR prosthesis.  On or about July 17, 2010, a Class 2 recall of many of the ASR components was posted on the FDA’s website  and both the DePuy ASR XL Acetabular and DePuy ASR Hip Resurfacing Systems were recalled.    It appears that there are some 27,000 people in the United States who have replacement hips that are the subject of the recall.  The company has said that only the DePuy ASR XL Acetabular system was used in the United States.

The symptoms of the problem include pain, swelling and problems walking.  Continuing symptoms may indicate that the implant is not staying attached to the bone in the correct position, has been fractured, or has been dislocated.   Another problem is the release of metal particles into the joint and in the muscles around the joint.  In some patients this can result in pain and swelling and could cause damage to the muscles, bones and nerves around the hip.  Tests are necessary to determine if the hip is working properly and if there is a reaction to the metal particles.

Here is an excerpt of what DePuy website says about the recall on its website:

This recall means additional testing and treatment may be necessary to ensure your hip implant is functioning well. DePuy intends to cover reasonable and customary costs of testing and treatment, including revision surgery if it is necessary, associated with the ASR recall. Even if you do not have out-of-pocket medical expenses, please contact the DePuy ASR Help Line so that you may be assigned a claim number. This will allow DePuy to process other reasonable out-of-pocket costs, such as lost work time and travel expenses, which may be reimbursed. These costs will be more clearly defined shortly and are subject to review on a case-by-case basis.

In plain English, this means DePuy may pay lost work time and travel expenses but apparently is refusing to pay other damages associated with this product failure, such a pain, suffering, disfigurement, or disability associated with yet another hip surgery and recovery.   I haven't seen your letter, but the website doesn't mention that there is a deadline for filing suit under Tennessee law (and the law of other states as well).  Under Tennessee law, the failure to file suit within one year will result in a loss of rights and DePuy will be legally obligated to pay nothing to Tennessee residents who were harmed by the device.

I suggest that you contact a lawyer to help you understand what your options are under Tennessee law.   We are filing a lawsuit against DePuy on Monday October 4 concerning these hip replacement systems.

 

She is Telling Lies About Me!

My neighbor has been telling awful lies about me and is ruining my reputation.  Can I sue her?

Yes, but you may have difficulty finding a lawyer to help you do it.  If your neighbor is truly spreading lies and these lies are hurting your reputation, you can sue her for slander.  In Tennessee, you must file suit within six months of the day the slanderous words were spoken.

The problem is that most lawyers will not handle such a case on a contingent fee basis unless significant damages can be proven and there is some likelihood that the damages can be collected.  Thus, if the person who has been slandering you has no money,  a lawyer will be reluctant to take the case because he or she will not get paid for the work they do.

Of course, if you have money yourself you can hire a lawyer to help you and pay him or her by the hour for the legal work.   But, unfortunately, many people get away with saying horrible things about other people because the victim cannot afford to hire a lawyer by the hour and the wrongdoer does not have sufficient assets or income to enable to lawyer to work on a contingent fee.

Ask A Question Case Evaluation
Twitter Facebook
About John A. Day

I am a fifty-three year old lawyer who is fascinated by the law of torts. I have studied the field for over twenty-nine years. I represent plaintiffs in personal injury and wrongful death cases.

Read More »